"I'll remain in the same office by 2027," Starmer stated, joking that if the interview proceeded smoothly, he might invite the interviewer into his official residence for another talk next year.
For a PM, there's rarely ever break for prime ministers. Shortly before we sat down, Sir Keir had been speaking with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky and trying to decipher precisely had transpired in Venezuela, where his big friend, US President Donald Trump, had recently targeted and seized its leader, Nicolás Maduro.
By the time the discussion, which was much longer than normal, had ended, Maduro had been formally accused in New York.
As the new year begins, Sir Keir seems to have had a kind of a reboot. Maybe even just some relaxation with his family at Chequers, the prime minister's official country residence.
This seemed to have resulted in better spirits than at the difficult tail end of 2025, a dreadful annus horribilis for him.
But are he and his colleagues being unrealistic if they believe his political fate are set to improve?
The uncomfortable truth for the PM is that a significant number of his fellow MPs think he's ineffective at his job. Some of them would rather gamble and get him out sooner rather than later.
However Starmer was rejecting the idea during our conversation on Saturday morning.
Repeatedly he insisted he'd be "assessed at the general election", insisting no one would remove his electoral mandate from him – even if the most effective strategy of preventing Nigel Farage and Reform UK reaching No 10 could be for Labour to replace its leader.
"We are in the struggle of our lifetime and I intend to be at the forefront," he declared.
The problem for the prime minister is that he will be scrutinised well ahead of then – in a major set of elections in May across the UK. He tried to protest, perhaps too much, that they are concerning who runs councils, and who runs the devolved administrations in Holyrood or Cardiff – and not a verdict on Westminster.
Accurate – in part. But although he may be reluctant to acknowledge it, No 10 will be evaluated by those elections too.
This did not stop Sir Keir suggesting that there were no situation under which he would walk away, should one of his MPs contested his leadership for the job, if those elections prove disastrous for Labour.
He sought to account for his low poll ratings by saying the voters was understandably anxious for things to get better. He sought to persuade the interviewer, and the nation, that 2026 would be distinct.
The economy would recover in the face of rising unemployment, he argued, when plans the government implemented during their initial choppy year began to take effect.
His central argument is that this year the country will "reach a turning point".
The prime minister may have communicated with renewed vitality than I've seen from him for a while – more relaxed, perhaps, with a longer slot to talk.
But despite facing calls from many directions for a bolder approach, with increased political clarity, more urgency, more speed and more urgency, his explanations were well-known ones.
Given that he is in this much political peril, should he consider a new narrative?
No administration, and certainly not one that has been unpopular for an extended period, gets everything its as desired.
Sir Keir's challenges are not just because governing is hard, but because he and his team have faltered, including in the last few weeks.
The prime minister admitted that he was sorry for saying he was "delighted" to welcome back the Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abd El Fattah to the UK after an controversy when past remarks he'd made in the past – including calls for Zionists and police to be killed – came to light.
Starmer blamed "the system" for not realising what the activist had said before – a more diplomatic way of saying it wasn't his responsibility.
And he is inviting obvious political risks as the year gets going. His close relationship with the US president acquires a new complication after Trump's military action on Venezuela.
Based on years of interviewing Sir Keir Starmer, a former human rights lawyer who opposed the war in Iraq, over many years, the idea he would be content with such action seems far-fetched.
He asserted he was a "career-long advocate of international law" but we "simply haven't got the full picture at the moment".
Some called for him to criticise the action prior to we spoke. And the administration is likely to face more pressure to give an clear view in Parliament in the next few days.
And there has always been growing tension in the Labour party to undo or remake some of the outcomes of Brexit.
The PM disputes he's doing that, but his new specific pledge to move closer with the EU's single market – the huge economic European trading zone – will probably provoke howls that he is reneging on his promise never to try to undo the results that stemmed from Brexit.
A decision to align with more of the single market will satisfy some on his backbenches, but it is easy fodder for Reform and the Conservatives to
Elara is a former odds compiler turned betting analyst, sharing data-driven strategies to help bettors maximize their returns.
Jesse Stein
Jesse Stein
Jesse Stein
Jesse Stein
Jesse Stein
Jesse Stein